The History of a Crime


google search for The History of a Crime

Return to Master Book Index.

Page
55 56 57 58 59

Quick Jump
1 171 343 514 685

to suffer such an outrage to be accepted by the hours as they elapse.  
Each minute which passes is an accomplice, and endorses the crime.  
Beware of that calamity called an 'Accomplished fact.' To arms!"  
Many warmly supported this advice, among others Edgar Quinet, Pelletier,  
and Doutre.  
Michel de Bourges seriously  
objected. My instinct was to begin at once, his advice was to wait and  
see. According to him there was danger in hastening the catastrophe. The  
coup d'état was organized, and the People were not. They had been  
taken unawares. We must not indulge in illusion. The masses could not  
stir yet. Perfect calm reigned in the faubourgs; Surprise existed, yes;  
Anger, no. The people of Paris, although so intelligent, did not  
understand.  
Michel added, "We are not in 1830. Charles X., in turning out the 221,  
exposed himself to this blow, the re-election of the 221. We are not in  
the same situation. The 221 were popular. The present Assembly is not: a  
Chamber which has been insultingly dissolved is always sure to conquer,  
if the People support it. Thus the People rose in 1830. To-day they  
wait. They are dupes until they shall be victims." Michel de Bourges  
concluded, "The People must be given time to understand, to grow angry,  
to rise. As for us, Representative, we should be rash to precipitate the  
situation. If we were to march immediately straight upon the troops, we  
should only be shot to no purpose, and the glorious insurrection for  
Right would thus be beforehand deprived of its natural leaders--the  
Representatives of the People. We should decapitate the popular army.  
5
7


Page
55 56 57 58 59

Quick Jump
1 171 343 514 685